ECONOMIC OVERVIEW

  • Central bank decisions await in Chile, Brazil, the U.S., the U.K., Japan, Norway, and Switzerland, alongside key data releases in the Latam and G10 regions, all the while markets keep a close eye on Israel-Iran developments and news out of the G7 summit in Canada. U.S. markets are shut on Thursday, while those in Chile are out on Friday.
  • While our call is for a 25bps cut, Chile’s central bank may err on the side of caution following the latest geopolitical developments that have heightened external risks. Brazilian officials may also prefer to roll out a hike instead of holding, though it’s anyone’s guess at this point.
  • Peru’s economic growth shifted into a lower gear in April, but blame Easter-timing effects against a strong GDP trend in the country that is accompanied by under-control inflation. If only everything was goldilocks in Peru. In today’s report, the team contrasts solid macro trends against continuing political noise, and some fiscal risks.
  • In Mexico, the local economists discuss recent inflation trends that may be starting to build some worry among Banxico members, who may soon consider shifting into a slower pace of easing—perhaps even a rate hold, though not in June, when a 50bps rate cut remains the safest bet. Colombia releases economic activity data that will be impacted by calendar effects, during an otherwise quiet week.

PACIFIC ALLIANCE COUNTRY UPDATES

  • We assess key insights from the last week, with highlights on the main issues to watch over the coming fortnight in the Pacific Alliance countries: Mexico and Peru.

MARKET EVENTS & INDICATORS

  • A comprehensive risk calendar with selected highlights for the period June 14–27 across the Pacific Alliance countries and Brazil.

Chart of the Week

Chart 1: Nominal Rate; Chart 2: "Real" Rate

ECONOMIC OVERVIEW: CENTRAL BANK DECISIONS, MAY ECONOMIC UPDATES, AND EXTERNAL RISKS 

Juan Manuel Herrera, Senior Economist
+52.55.2299.6675 
juanmanuel.herrera@scotiabank.com

  • Central bank decisions await in Chile, Brazil, the U.S., the U.K., Japan, Norway, and Switzerland, alongside key data releases in the Latam and G10 regions, all the while markets keep a close eye on Israel-Iran developments and news out of the G7 summit in Canada. U.S. markets are shut on Thursday, while those in Chile are out on Friday.
  • While our call is for a 25bps cut, Chile’s central bank may err on the side of caution following the latest geopolitical developments that have heightened external risks. Brazilian officials may also prefer to roll out a hike instead of holding, though it’s anyone’s guess at this point.
  • Peru’s economic growth shifted into a lower gear in April, but blame Easter-timing effects against a strong GDP trend in the country that is accompanied by under-control inflation. If only everything was goldilocks in Peru. In today’s report, the team contrasts solid macro trends against continuing political noise, and some fiscal risks.
  • In Mexico, the local economists discuss recent inflation trends that may be starting to build some worry among Banxico members, who may soon consider shifting into a slower pace of easing—perhaps even a rate hold, though not in June, when a 50bps rate cut remains the safest bet. Colombia releases economic activity data that will be impacted by calendar effects, during an otherwise quiet week.

The week ahead is a fairly busy one in Latam and abroad, with central bank decisions in Chile, Brazil, the U.S., the U.K., Japan, Norway, and Switzerland, among others, accompanied by economic activity readings out of Colombia, Peru, and Brazil as well as key data from the U.S., Canada, China, and the U.K. (including retail sales for all), and U.K. and Japanese CPI. Ex-calendar risks are also aplenty, with markets opening from the weekend and reacting throughout the week to Israel-Iran developments, news out of the G7 meetings in Canada starting on Sunday, and the usual trade noise, of course (maybe something positive will come out of the G7?). U.S. markets are shut on Thursday for Juneteenth.

Chile’s central bank’s decision on Tuesday was on track to be a more divided one, with some calling for a hold, while others believing the BCCh is possibly justified in rolling out a 25bps rate cut alongside the release of new projections in its Monetary Policy Report (see here). Heightened geopolitical risks have injected a high degree of uncertainty for next week’s decision, however. The Costa-led central bank may err on the side of caution and opt for another rate hold, thus postponing their next rate cut to their late-July meeting and extending their on-pause streak since the last reduction in December. We expect the BCCh will lower its inflation forecasts as well as lift its GDP growth forecasts, mostly on the basis of data released since their last MPR. Note that Chilean markets are closed on Friday for National Indigenous Peoples Day.

The BCB’s rate announcement on Wednesday will be a heavily contested decision, with roughly half of economists expecting a rate hold at the current 14.75% while the other half anticipate a small 25bps hike. Markets aren’t willing to break the tie either, pricing in about 13bps, or a virtual toss-up. Like Chile, external risks may motivate Brazilian officials to opt for the more hawkish choice and roll out a quarter-point increase that would likely be the last of the cycle, with higher oil prices also playing a role into their decision considering that inflation remains elevated and inflation expectations only recently seem to have steadied. It’s going to be a tight one, coming a day after April economic activity figures that should show weakish growth, if only because of base effects that would interrupt the strong trend that Brazil’s economy has been in over the past year or so.

In Peru, we kick off the week to Sunday’s release of April GDP and May unemployment figures. In today’s report, the team goes over their expectation for the GDP release which should show a material slowdown from March’s near 5% rise. The data should not be an accurate representation of economic trends in the country, as calendar effects associated with the timing of Easter and agricultural schedules. Set that aside, and data for May show the country regained strong economic momentum. But while all is well on the economic front (inflation is also well anchored), politics remain a headache/fly in the ointment in an otherwise goldilocks situation. Our economists in Peru speak today on the various domestic political and fiscal imbroglios catching their eye.

Turning to Mexico, the week ahead is a fairly quiet one as far as data are concerned (Q1 GDP details and the Citi economists survey), but we’ll be keeping a close eye on what Sheinbaum’s appearance on the sidelines of the G7 summit delivers, with Mexico’s president due to meet her USMCA counterparts, Trump and Carney, and possibly agree to another easing of tariffs. In today’s Weekly, the team discusses recent upside pressures in inflation that may be building some anxiety among the members of Banxico’s board around the path ahead for rates. Comments by officials over recent days clearly point to the bank eyeing the end of half-point cuts soon, and possibly a pause as early as the August 7th decision. Odds remain decently in favour of a 50bps move at the June 26th decision, but there’s a chance that another upside surprise in mid-June CPI figures out on the 24th sees one or more Banxico members opting for a smaller cut, proposing that the bank takes a step back to observe changing conditions.

Last but not least, Colombia also has a relatively quiet one up ahead, but we’ll watch the release of April economic activity and international trade data on Wednesday and Friday, respectively. This morning, we got mixed data for April, with a very strong retail sales print at 11.4% y/y (3ppts above the Bloomberg median) in contrast to a disappointing industrial production reading of -4.8% y/y (~1.5ppts worse than the median), as the latter seems to have been more heavily impacted by Easter timing effects but also reflecting the weak investment sentiment plaguing Colombia. At least, household spending remains in good shape, continuing to support the domestic economy against business caution and fiscal risks. Our economists estimate that economic activity expanded by a touch under 1% y/y in April, slowing from the strong 4.5% showing in March. 

PACIFIC ALLIANCE COUNTRY UPDATES

Mexico—This Week, May’s Inflation Figures Sparked Fresh Debate About its Trajectory, Potential Risks, and the Implications for Monetary Policy

Rodolfo Mitchell, Director of Economic and Sectoral Analysis
+52.55.3977.4556 (Mexico)
mitchell.cervera@scotiabank.com.mx

Brian Pérez, Quant Analyst
+52.55.5123.1221 (Mexico)
bperezgu@scotiabank.com.mx

Miguel Saldaña, Economist
+52.55.5123.1718 (Mexico)
msaldanab@scotiabank.com.mx

In May, headline inflation (chart 1) rose to 4.42% y/y from 3.93% (vs. 4.37% consensus in the Citi Survey), while core inflation increased to 4.06% from 3.93% (vs. 4.02% consensus). However, biweekly figures paint a more concerning picture. Headline inflation climbed to 4.62%, its highest level since October 2024, and core inflation surpassed the 4.0% threshold, accelerating to 4.15%—its highest since May of the previous year—driven by a rebound in goods inflation (3.84%), which also reached its highest level in over a year.

Chart 1: Mexico: Consumer vs Producer Prices

Additionally, the increase was fueled by a sharp rise in the most volatile component of price dynamics: agricultural products. Notably, many analysts highlighted the surge in beef (16.64%) and chicken (12.0%) prices, influenced by several factors including higher feed costs, increased transportation expenses, weather conditions, stronger international demand, and some animal health issues (bird flu). However, focusing solely on volatile factors may not be enough to fully grasp the risks ahead.

As we’ve noted throughout the year, despite its downtrend, the inflation risk balance remains tilted to the upside. It’s important to recognize that an upward bias has different implications depending on the timing: in 2022, it meant inflation could continue rising, whereas now it suggests the disinflation trend could pause or even reverse.

In this context, it’s worth highlighting producer price behavior to better understand the cost pressures businesses face (charts 2 and 3). The National Producer Price Index (excluding oil) showed an uptrend through most of 2024, starting last year at 1.02% and peaking at 7.92% y/y in February 2025, before easing to 6.81% in May. By sectors, industrial activities (excluding oil) began rising in the second half of last year—coinciding with growing investor uncertainties—and currently show the most pressure, at 7.58%, with only three months of deceleration. Meanwhile, services, though with some pauses, have remained relatively stable at a high level since late 2022 (5.42% in May 2025), which may partly explain the persistence of service inflation in consumer prices. These figures are particularly relevant, as both the general index and industrial activity trends appear to impact consumer inflation with a six-month lag.

Chart 2: Mexico: Services Consumer Prices vs Terciary Producer Prices; Chart 3: Mexico: Manufacturing Producer Prices vs Merchandise Consumer Prices

In line with this, recent communications from members of Banxico’s Governing Board reveal concern about the rebound in inflation. While we believe the Board will follow through on its forward guidance from the last meeting—teeing up another 50 basis point cut in June—we expect the decision will not be unanimous and will lack the dovish tone seen in previous meetings this year. In fact, at least two of the five Board members have expressed concerns about current inflationary pressures and whether they are transitory or structural, casting doubt on inflation’s convergence to the 3% target by 2026 Q3. In this context, these members have mentioned the possibility of a pause in August to reassess and recalibrate the monetary stance amid sharp inflationary pressures, potentially shifting to a slower and less aggressive rate-cutting cycle. We’ll see in two weeks whether a third member joins this view or if the forward guidance of 50 basis point cuts continues.

Peru—If Only Politics Were As Healthy As Macro Accounts

Guillermo Arbe, Head Economist, Peru
+51.1.211.6052 (Peru)
guillermo.arbe@scotiabank.com.pe

In Peru, growth is doing well, and prices are as stable as one can hope for. April GDP will be released on Sunday, June 15th, and may be available by the time many of you read this. The low growth figure that you will likely see for April is an outlier, and reflects a high base (April 2024), and fewer working days in 2025 due to the Easter holidays. In addition, agricultural GDP fell 11.5% y/y in April 2025, because of shifts in the production season. This is not indicative of weakness, and agricultural GDP growth should recover in May.

Looking at the leading indicators for April, these are weaker than in March, although not exceptionally so. Even so, given that April will be an outlier, it might be best to skip ahead and look at May, where early indicators are looking very robust again (see table 1).

Table 1: Peru—Economic Indicators 2025

In any event, Peru’s quandaries do not lie in its economy, but in its politics, namely in Congress. Peru’s legislature continues to put top government figures in a state of jeopardy, constantly calling in members of the cabinet for potential impeachment. As for impeaching President Dina Boluarte herself, Congress has so far been divided on how to deal with the multitude of controversies surrounding her. The controversy du jour involves allegations that President Boluarte underwent cosmetic surgery without requesting congressional authorization. The issue has grown because President Boluarte has denied that this surgery took place, but has been contradicted by other sources. The issue has once again brought to the fore the spectre of presidential impeachment, although for this to happen would take a more aggressive stance by a stronger Congressional majority than has occurred so far.

An event that could, potentially, have a bearing on the relationship between Congress and the Boluarte government in general, and on the possibility of an impeachment process emerging more specifically, is the upcoming election of the new congressional presiding board. The presiding board is appointed for a yearly term, and has broad powers to determine the congressional agenda. The current board president is Eduardo Salhuana. Congress will be in recess from June 16th to July 26th. Once it returns to normal sessions on July 27th, it will be presided by the newly elected board.

A key issue, in terms of the likelihood of a presidential impeachment, is the appetite the new Congressional president might have for becoming Peru’s president for a year. Peru has no vice-president currently, as Dina Boluarte was elected VP in 2021, and came to power by replacing then President Pedro Castillo in late 2022 after his aborted coup attempt. Therefore, if President Boluarte were to be impeached, the presidency would fall upon the head of Congress.

Another issue that has sparked controversy domestically, is the state of fiscal accounts. The fiscal deficit has improved, and now stands at 2.9% of GDP (chart 4), its lowest level in over a year. This is not what has provoked controversy. Rather, the new finance minister, Raúl Pérez Reyes, stated that the government would increase the legal fiscal rule this year from a 2.2% of GDP fiscal deficit, to 2.8%. Although this level, 2.8%, is manageable, the fear by some analysts is twofold. One is that it is becoming customary for governments to act with little regard for the fiscal rule, which is very frequently simply changed per convenience. The second is that the additional resources would be distributed mostly to local governments, for political reasons, and without assuring efficient spending with an effective impact.

Chart 4: Peru: Fiscal Deficit

Curiously enough, it’s actually quite likely that the fiscal deficit for 2025 will come in below the 2.8% proposed new threshold. Government institutions, especially at the local government level, are not the most expedient spenders in the world, and any new resources that they receive, could stand idle for some time. Plus, tax revenue continues outperforming expectations (chart 5). Tax revenue rose 14.4%, y/y, in the year-to-April.

Chart 5: Tax Revenue and Public Expenditure

The minister of finance exercised questionable judgement in announcing the increase in the fiscal deficit policy only days before placing a PEN10 bn bond offering. The 10-year bond offering garnered a rate of 7.69%, and was only 1.3x oversubscribed. Much of the funds will be used for debt restructuring through an offer to repurchase bonds that will come due between 2026 and 2031.

To end on a clearly positive note, external accounts are soaring. Exports are up 14.3%, y/y in the year-to-April (28% y/y in April alone), while imports rose 6.8% y/y in the same period. It’s clear that the global tariff uncertainty has yet to impact Peru negatively. Peru’s current account was 1.4% of GDP in Q1 (chart 6), and has been positive for eight consecutive quarters, which is very unusual, historically.

Chart 6: Peru: Current Account Balance
Forecast Updates
Forecast Updates-Changes Compared To Previous Latam Weekly
Forecast Updates: Central Bank Policy Rates and Outlook
Charts 1-6 Key Economic Charts
Charts 1-6 Key Market Charts
Charts 1-6 Yield Curves
Charts 7-12 Yield Curves
Charts 13-18 Yield Curves
Market Events & Indicators for June 14 - 27
Market Events & Indicators for June 14 - 27
 
LOCAL MARKET COVERAGE
CHILE  
Website: Click here to be redirected
Subscribe: anibal.alarcon@scotiabank.cl
Coverage: Spanish and English
   
COLOMBIA  
Website: Click here to be redirected
Subscribe: jackeline.pirajan@scotiabankcolptria.com
Coverage: Spanish and English
   
MEXICO  
Website: Click here to be redirected
Subscribe: estudeco@scotiacb.com.mx
Coverage: Spanish
   
PERU  
Website: Click here to be redirected
Subscribe: siee@scotiabank.com.pe
Coverage: Spanish