• Payrolls jumped by more than our top–of–consensus call
  • Revisions were positive as were many details
  • But the lack of breadth to sectors and potential temporary effects are yellow flags
  • Why hopping on the hike bandwagon may be premature
 
  • US nonfarm payrolls m/m 000s / UR %, SA, May:
  • Actual: 172 / 4.3
  • Scotia: 125 / 4.3
  • Consensus: 88 / 4.3
  • Prior: 179 / 4.3 (revised from +115 / 4.3)

The US job market performed rather well last month including positive revisions. Nonfarm payrolls jumped higher by 172k exceeding all estimates although mine was the highest in consensus at 125k. A 90% confidence band around the estimated change would be between about 50k–300k. Details were fairly solid but the lack of breadth by sector and the potential temporary effects merit caution.

MARKETS PREMATURELY PRICING HIKES?

Markets reacted by slamming the US front-end. The US 2-year Treasury yield is about 10bps higher on the day in a bear flattener move. The dollar is up against all comers except CAD that also got a jobs boost. Markets increased pricing for a Fed hike later this year by about 9bps to a full 25bps hike. Markets also lean toward most of another hike being priced into next Spring. Stocks fell because of fears the Fed could hike.

Pricing hikes feels highly premature. The Fed is in restrictive territory, unlike the BoC that also got a solid jobs report. Annual nonfarm benchmarking revisions are ahead in September about one week before that month’s FOMC meeting. Inflation’s spike may be more temporary this time than previously. Chair Warsh may change up the preferred measure of core inflation toward central tendency gauges like trimmed mean PCE that is tracking considerably lower than core PCE and thereby talk through an inflation spurt. The pressures on growth have been meaningful to date (0.5% in Q4, 1.6% in Q1). Further pressures probably lie ahead given no inflation-adjusted disposable income growth for three quarters up to Q1 and with real wages getting squeezed by the commodity surge. With growth risks go employment risks. And short-term reports don’t wave goodbye to uncertainty around AI’s effects and tighter immigration.

DETAILS—MOSTLY POSITIVE

On top of the 172k nonfarm payroll positions that were created there were positive revisions that added 93k jobs to the prior two months including 64k more in April (179k) and 29k more to March (+214k). Chart 1. The three-month moving average for payroll gains is now 188k/mth. I still want to see what revisions up to March survive annual benchmarking in September. It’s extra impressive to see such job growth in May despite a higher jumping off point that—all else equal—would have made it more difficult to post another gain.

Chart 1: US Non-Farm Payroll Revisions

By sector the gains were highly concentrated in just three categories which suggests the overall report wasn’t as strong as the headline gain (chart 2). One sector was the leisure/hospitality category that led the way (+70k) followed by government that added 52k jobs, all of which was in state/local employment (+51k, chart 3). Education and health services added 40k entirely due to health and social assistance (+47k).

Chart 2: May Changes in US Non-Farm Payroll Employment; Chart 3: US Hiring At State & Local Government Level

Within leisure/hospitality, most of the gain was in accommodation (10k) and food services and drinking places (48k). That could be driven by patio weather and Spring travel but also bear in mind the possibility that it could be in preparation for FIFA World Cup hiring and related tourism.

What if leisure/hospitality and local government hiring is related to temporary factors like the World Cup with 11 US cities hosting (3 Mexico, two Canada)?

Within health care’s 35k rise, two-thirds of it was in ambulatory services.

Within government’s 52k extra payrolls, 43.5k was attributable to local governments excluding education sector roles.

The unemployment rate was stable at 4.3% (chart 4). That’s because it’s drawn from the companion household survey which registered a job gain of 149k that exceeded the increase in the labour force of 83k. The household survey’s job gain was the first one this year as its trend continues to defy nonfarm’s trend.

Chart 4: US Unemployment Rate

The softness in the labour force reflects a falling labour force participation rate (ie: the share of the population that counts itself employed or looking for work). Chart 5. This is heavily driven by falling participation rates by those aged 55+.

Chart 5: US Participation Rate

Private payrolls were up by 120k with services (92k) leading while goods sectors added 28k.

The birth-death model additions added fewer than normal months of May in the past (chart 6). This follows the outsized contributions of birth-death model adjustments to seasonally unadjusted payrolls in some prior months (chart 7).

Chart 6: US Birth-Death Model Adjustments For the Month of May; Chart 7: US Birth-Death Model Adjustments

Hours worked were up by about 0.1% m/m SA with Q2 tracking a gain of 1.4% q/q SAAR which would be strong compared to the past pattern (chart 8). This could be a solid indicator of Q2 GDP growth as GDP is hours times labour productivity.

Chart 8: US Total Hours Worked

Nominal wages were solid at 3.9% m/m SAAR (chart 9). The smoothed trend is weaker and real wages (ie: inflation adjusted) are weakening.

Chart 9: US Hourly Wages