• The Bank of England (BoE) matched expectations by keeping its policy rate steady at 3.75%, in a 7 hold vs 2 hike vote split, remaining on standby amid upside inflation risks against ongoing demand weakness.
  • If recent conditions in energy markets remain in place, with prices well off their highs but still above pre-conflict levels, the BoE would likely stand pat for the remainder of the year, although it stands ready to act if prices jump again or if data show clear second-round effects of higher energy prices. Our latest pre-peace deal forecast of two BoE hikes this year is at risk of revision.
  • With the BoE’s communications generally meeting expectations in terms of the vote split, guidance, and the comments provided by policymakers, U.K. yields came off their intraday highs to practically close at the same levels as at the market open. Markets are pricing in about ~30bps in hikes by year-end, unchanged from yesterday’s close.

As widely expected, the Bank of England (BoE) kept its policy rate steady at 3.75%, remaining on standby in the face of upside inflation risks against ongoing demand weakness. Officials were split 7–2 in today’s decision, with hawks Pill (chief economist) and Greene (external member) preferring a 25bps rate increase compared to the 8–1 decision in late-April when only Pill voted for a hike.

Developments in global energy markets remain the leading driver of expectations for near-term BoE policy settings. The sharp decline in energy prices in recent days due to the U.S.-Iran peace deal (pending full agreement after negotiations) has significantly reduced upside inflation risks. If energy prices were to hold around current levels ($75–80/bbl for Brent oil)—or possibly head lower if a deal is finalized and energy flows resume quickly—the BoE would simply stand pat for the balance of the year. This is in contrast to our latest forecast of two 25bps rate hikes (in 3Q and Q426) that incorporated a higher energy price outlook, and is thus subject to revision.

Despite the relief in global energy prices and clearer signs of domestic economic weakness, the BoE is unlikely to return to an easing path this year as officials will still have to observe the impact of higher petrol costs and utility bills on an economy where inflation has been very stubborn in its convergence to target. In May data released yesterday, CPI excluding housing, utilities, and fuels (a ‘supercore’ measure) inflation came in at 3.2% y/y, sitting around or slightly above the 3% level practically every month since January 2025.

Regulated home energy bills also respond to with a lag to ‘live’ developments in global oil and gas prices due to the regulator’s pricing mechanism. This means that Britons that saw a 7% q/q drop in their electricity and gas bill in the April–June quarter (mainly thanks to government subsidies) will face a 13% q/q increase in the July–September quarter that responds to high pre-peace deal energy prices. Possible second-round effects around inflation and wage expectations from this rise in household bills and higher petrol prices will have to be monitored by the BoE over a few months before they gain confidence around the direction for the policy rate.

The peace deal may have brought some prices relief in commodity markets but there’s no certainty that this ceasefire will hold nor do we know how quickly energy flows could resume through the Strait of Hormuz. In any case, it should take several months to return to pre-conflict exports/production levels and a geopolitical premium will likely remain in place, keeping prices higher versus late-February conditions.

It would be far too early for the BoE to change its tune in response to recent developments, so it unsurprisingly “stands ready to act as necessary to ensure that CPI inflation remains on track to meet the 2% target in the medium term”—as it did in the late-April rate announcement. Nonetheless, the BoE outlined the would-be impact on its inflation forecasts (which were just updated in the April Monetary Policy Report) from incorporating energy prices as of June 15th. According to the statement, “inflation was now expected to be a little under 3% in Q3-26 and pick up to a little over 3¼% in Q4,” thus about half a percentage point lower than the 3.6/3.7% for Q4-26 that the bank penciled in under its A and B scenarios in the April MPR.

The two voters in favour of a hike and Mann’s comments that either scenario—one with rapid resolution and a rebound in activity while energy prices remain high, or one with “sporadic continuance” of the conflict with higher energy prices—would warrant an “activist hike” suggests that she will join Greene and Pill’s hike votes at the September decision. The overall tone of officials was one of keeping their options open, and Gov Bailey highlighted that the higher energy prices of the past few months will still have an inflationary impact. While the BoE did not hike, it is certainly not considering a rate cut. For now, it is also benefitting from the run up in borrowing rates over the past few months that have acted as somewhat as a stand-in to actual policy rate hikes in terms of delivering more restrictive financial conditions.

Coming on the heels of yesterday’s hawkish surprise by the Federal Reserve, U.K. markets were likely trading cautiously into today’s announcement with 2yr gilt yields rising close to 5bps in the hour prior to the decision; U.K. wages and employment data published earlier today was also stronger than expected. With the BoE’s communications generally meeting expectations in terms of the vote split, guidance, and the comments provided by policymakers, U.K. yields came off their highs to practically close at the same levels as at the market open; 2s closed 4bps higher and 10s closed flat. At writing, markets are pricing in a total of ~30bps in BoE hikes by end-2026 (peaking at 40bps in April/June 2027), unchanged from yesterday’s local close but down about 5bps from the pre-statement peak. The GBP is in the bottom half of the G10 currency leaderboard against the USD, falling by 0.5% (similarly to the JPY’s decline) to the 1.32 mark.