• Chile: IMACEC expanded 9% y/y, with a slight drop of 0.5% m/m in non-mining activities
  • Colombia: January unemployment rate at 14.6% as services sector continues to lead gains
  • Peru: To impeach or not to impeach, that is the question… yet again

CHILE: IMACEC EXPANDED 9% Y/Y, WITH A SLIGHT DROP OF 0.5% M/M IN NON-MINING ACTIVITIES

Smooth deceleration in economic activity, resilient investment.

On Tuesday, March 1, the central bank (BCCh) released the Imacec for January, which grew 9.0% y/y, slightly below market expectations (Economic Expectations Survey: 9.3%; Bloomberg: 10.7%) and Scotiabank’s (11%). The health and business services sectors made the largest contributions to Imacec’s year-on-year growth, followed far behind by commerce. The dynamism of business services reflects the resilience of private investment as shown by imports of capital goods and the continued execution of important projects despite political uncertainty.

Imacec’s seasonally adjusted series shows a drop of 1% m/m in January, which confirms a smooth deceleration of activity (chart 1). Indeed, in seasonally adjusted terms, the growth of 1.3% m/m in services stood out, coming on top of several months of expansion (chart 2). Although a gradual slowdown in trade (-3.2% m/m) was observed, households are likely cushioning the decline in fiscal transfers by building up liquidity in checking accounts (USD 17 bn as of January 2022). Looking ahead, the start of the Universal Guaranteed Pension payments in February, which provides resources to age groups with a high propensity to consume, should help fuel spending.


In contrast, goods production registered the largest monthly drop since June 2020 (-2.4% m/m), likely owing to weakness in the construction sector, which is inconsistent with the relaxation of pandemic restrictions. Recall that in mid-2020 the entire economy was in lockdown and construction with strict operational measures was practically paralyzed. Restrictions are now more focused, and the construction sector is operating more normally. All in all, the non-mining sector showed a fall of 0.5% m/m, below what was observed in previous years, showing a slowdown that, for now, would be limited.

The mining sector, which contracted 0.8% m/m and contributed 0.3 percentage points to the m/m fall of the Imacec, had a greater than usual share in total activity, an abnormality that could be linked to the base-level effects generated by the pandemic. More details will be known with the publication of the national accounts on March 18. In any event, the drop in the mining Imacec showed a dynamic like that reported by the statistical agency (INE) in terms of production, confirming the drop in the level observed in December.

—Jorge Selaive, Anibal Alarcón, & Waldo Riveras

COLOMBIA: JANUARY UNEMPLOYMENT RATE AT 14.6% AS SERVICES SECTOR CONTINUES TO LEAD GAINS

Employment data for January, released on Monday, February 28, showed the nationwide unemployment rate at 14.6%, while the urban unemployment (major cities) was 14.8% (chart 3). Both measures were lower than the 2021 levels of 17.5% and 19.4%, respectively. Services sectors remained the main contributors to the employment gains, a trend that is expected to continue as the economy returns to normality.


Because the national statistical agency, DANE, also presented an update in the methodology of population statistics, seasonally adjusted statistics are not available to compare marginal improvements.

Despite the increase in COVID-19 cases in January, major cities operated without substantial restrictions. In this respect, services sectors performed better compared with one year ago. In January, the economically-active population stood around 20.7 million people, while the pre-pandemic average was 22.2 million, pointing to the fact that there is still a gap to close. 

From a sectoral perspective, two-thirds of employment creation (1.58 million jobs) was concentrated in four sectors: commerce (+348 thousand), professional activities (+262 thousand), manufacturing (+232 thousand), and transport (+191 thousand). Agriculture was the only sector recording a contraction in employment, with 250 thousand jobs lost.

In terms of job quality, informal jobs accounted for 43.9% of total employment, down from January 2021 (47.4%), while the improvement in job quality was greater for urban areas, with the share of informal jobs falling from 46.2% one year ago to 42.5% in January 2022. However, self-employment continues to lead the gains in terms of job creation, accounting for 70% of new jobs. In terms of the gender gap, male unemployment stood at 11.2% in January as compared to 14.5 in January 2021, while female unemployment stood at 19.4% (21.4%). We expect the gaps to continue closing as in-person activities consolidate. 

Summing up, January’s employment data posted positive results, especially in services sectors while jobs losses in agriculture continued. However, employment still lags the recovery and the active population remains 3.5% lower than the pre-pandemic level. Going forward, monitoring the evolution of the labour market in terms of job quality is key.

—Sergio Olarte & Jackeline Piraján

PERU: TO IMPEACH OR NOT TO IMPEACH, THAT IS THE QUESTION… YET AGAIN

Talk of the impeachment of President Pedro Castillo is once again making the rounds in Congress, after statements made by a local businesswoman, Karelim López, accusing President Castillo of participating in acts of corruption were reported in the press. Meanwhile, the Minister of Transportation Juan Silva resigned late last night, a decision precipitated by the revelations made by López.

Karelim López, who is seeking to become part of the protected witness program, made the statements on February 18 to prosecuting attorneys that are investigating President Castillo’s possible involvement in improperly awarding tenders using State funds. The statements were reported by the press on Sunday, February 27. López stated that President Castillo, together with the Minister of Transportation, Juan Silva, the Minister of Housing, Geiner Alvarado, and of four members of Congress for taking part in the improper awarding of State contracts and tenders. López stated that President Castillo and Transportation Minister Silva would have participated directly in awarding tenders.

Immediately, opposition party leaders began calling for the impeachment of President Castillo. At the same time, Congress began debating the impeachment of Transportation Minister Silva. Before a decision could be made, Minister Silva resigned.

Government officials, including President Castillo, have countered by indicating that the fact that the statements made by López in confidence were leaked implies that the attorney general’s office was conspiring with opposition politicians to bring the Castillo Government down.

At the time of this writing, motions to impeach are reportedly being prepared and could conceivably be introduced to the congressional agenda soon. The elements that would support an impeachment are significant, and increase the chances, but do not ensure, that Congress could vote to impeach. It is, in particular, not clear how the different interest groups within in Congress would vote. Minister Silva’s resignation is likely to have been decided by President Castillo himself (Minister Silva had earlier said he would not resign) as a way to appease Congress and avoid the impeachment process. A lot will depend on who will be designated to replace Silva, as paucity in the criteria in Cabinet designations is one of the reasons that President Castillo is under fire. At the same time, the vote of confidence for the Anibal Torres Cabinet is still pending. It is scheduled for March 8.

—Guillermo Arbe

DISCLAIMER

This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.

These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.

Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.

Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.

This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.

™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.

Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.

Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.

Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.