ON DECK FOR TUESDAY, JULY 22

ON DECK FOR TUESDAY, JULY 22

KEY POINTS:

  • Mild risk-off tone amid a lack of fresh material developments
  • Fed’s Powell to open a conference on regulatory capital
  • Advice for Chair Powell to resign is just bonkers
  • Fed’s Bowman—dove—to speak
  • Canadian First Ministers retreat to plot strategy to deal with Trump
  • Stale BoC surveys offered nothing useful—despite the biased coverage
  • RBA minutes repeated the same message
  • Brazil’s President threatens trade war in response to Trump’s 50% tariffs

We have very dull markets this morning. There is little movement across any of the global asset classes that have a tinge of a risk-off feel to them, no unifying themes behind them, and very little by way of regional developments. We just have ridiculous narratives to contemplate, like El-Erian’s advice for Chair Powell to resign to protect the Fed which is bonkers in my opinion; resigning would damage the Fed, capitulate to political interference, and threaten its independence while dramatically amplifying uncertainty.

RBA minutes told us the same thing a second time with respect to why the RBA held at its last decision on July 8th and both the A$ and rates complex shook them off.

Brazilian President Lula threatened a trade war would begin with his response when Trump’s 50% tariff on Brazilian imports goes into effect on August 1st if Trump doesn’t change course. Watch the real.

Federal Reserve Chair Powell delivers opening remarks at a Fed conference on the regulatory capital framework (8:30amET). Governor Bowman delivers an interview at 1pmET mainly on regulatory issues but she has also opined that a cut in July may be feasible so watch for any further dissenting signals. Otherwise, the FOMC is in blackout until one day after the July 30th decision. The Richmond Fed’s manufacturing index will be refreshed for July (10amET) and regional surveys to date are constructive for the month of July.

Canadian First Ministers are gathering at Deerhurst Resort in Huntsville, Ontario to discuss trade tactics. There may be developments around opening remarks or subsequently (10amET).

Mexico updates some readings for back in May, including retail sales and the GDP proxy aka economic activity index (8amET).

STALE BOC SURVEYS SETTLED NOTHING

Why all the fuss yesterday in several articles about the Bank of Canada’s surveys (here and here)? Good heavens, doves, you’re really desperate for something to hang your hats on. Consider the following points:

  • First, the surveys are stale on arrival. Ridiculously so. The Canadian Survey of Consumer Expectations was conducted from April 24th to May 15th and there were follow up phone interviews from May 20th to 26th. Why on earth does it take any other consumer polling company little time to turn around in-month or in-week surveys, but it takes the BoC 2–3 months?! That’s just unacceptable folks especially these days when rolling on and off tariff threats have coincided with the election aftermath in Canada plus early fiscal stimulus and speculation toward how much more lies ahead. The Business Outlook Survey was conducted from May 8th to May 28th and the companion Business Leaders’ Pulse was conducted in each month of April, May and June but not July yet. Again, stale on arrival when the world’s fast paced developments require timeliness.
  • Second, even though just as stale or more so, why did all the articles choose to ignore that consumers’ inflation expectations were unchanged at elevated levels (chart 1)? That seems like an unhealthy bias to me. 
Chart 1: Canadian Consumers Inflation Expectations
  • Third, on the business surveys, there was nothing new that we didn’t already know from the CFIB’s survey of small businesses that had already shown the decline in inflation expectations on a monthly basis (chart 2). Across other business measures of inflation expectations over varying time periods the results were largely unchanged (chart 3).
Chart 2: Firms' Inflation Expectations; Chart 3: Canadian Businesses' Inflation Expectations
  • Fourth, who cares anyway. The BOS survey has a small sample of about 100 firms with questions posed to ‘senior management,’ whatever that means, but it’s unclear whether they’re close enough to the consequences of tariffs on pricing and ordering. At a certain exalted level the attachment to the core front line business becomes more and more remote. And the BOS survey’s measure of inflation expectations two-years ahead performs poorly as a measure of actual reported inflation two years ahead (chart 4); businesses tend to react to inflation bursts, rather than lead it and are no better at formulating expectations for their pricing plans than markets are at expecting inflation outbursts. Inflation is a complex beast and I’ve always found that neither businesses or consumers really have much understanding of the concept and when they form expectations it’s based on the price they just paid to fill up their gas tanks or grocery carts.
Chart 4: Business Outlook Survey Inflation Expectations Compared to Actual Inflation
  • Fifth, consumers aren’t any better than businesses (chart 5) and arguably a touch slower.
Chart 5: Inflation Expectations: Consumers vs Businesses

So all told, there is vast room for improvement of these surveys, and I wouldn’t attach much if any significance to them at least until they are much more timely and probably not really that much even then. The core issues affecting the BoC remain very little economic slack to date, inflation that has multiple drivers beyond output gaps that themselves involve a lot of guesswork, core inflation that remains far too hot in smoothed m/m SAAR terms to be contemplating easing any time soon, and high uncertainty surrounding the path forward for trade the fiscal policies. And that’s only a partial list.

Rates Table