Next Week's Risk Dashboard

• US payrolls to test resilience to Delta
• The evidence on Delta and kids
• Why jobs might disappoint into a new school year
• The Canadian election and markets
• GDP: Canada, Australia, India, Brazil
• PMIs: US (ISM), Mexico, China, India, Brazil
• CPI: EZ, Switzerland, Peru, Indonesia, SK
• CBs: Chile to hike

Chart of the Week

Friday’s US jobs report and its possible influences on global markets and the Federal Reserve’s policy stance will be important in two respects. First, it will inform how US job markets are holding up as the Delta variant took off. Second, it will help to set the stage for how job markets may fare as parents and schoolkids head into another uncertain academic year. Other global developments will be relatively light over the coming week.


US jobs data arrive on Friday for the month of August, but the transition to the new school year that begins in September for most school kids may prove to be more important to markets and might not unfold the way many expect.

I went with +650k for nonfarm in August and another dip in the unemployment rate to 5.2%. The August report might offer the first test of the US economy’s resilience in the face of rising COVID-19 cases. We already know that several activity readings have softened of late and it may be reasonable to expect the same for job growth. Supply-side issues may become more of a challenge in client-facing service sectors such that there could be fewer people willing to fill vacancies compared to the pattern of previously stronger gains in employment. Furthermore, as Marc Ercolao’s chart of the week demonstrates (see front cover), the low hanging fruit on bringing back relatively lower wage earners in sectors like leisure and hospitality that includes bars, restaurants and accommodations might have already been picked as lower wage employment has recovered to almost the same degree as higher wage employment.

This payrolls estimate may be further informed by data prints in the run-up to Friday’s nonfarm figures. Tuesday’s ‘jobs plentiful’ reading in consumer confidence for August could tell us more about what consumers witnessed by way of hiring sentiment. Wednesday’s ADP private payrolls report could be informative if it’s a real outlier. Wednesday’s ISM-manufacturing employment subindex could inform hiring appetite, but the more important ISM-services employment reading won’t arrive until after Friday’s payrolls report.


August payrolls are one thing, but how might job growth unfold through September when the kids head back to school? A view long held by many is that once the kids go back, the parents may be free to, well, perhaps do a lot of things not least of which being to go back to work and drive accelerated job growth. This important issue could affect the ongoing speed of recovery in job markets, the Federal Reserve’s ‘substantial further progress’ goals before it starts to taper, and broad spare capacity considerations with connections to inflation.

Are the Parents Already Back to Work?

But what if the parents already shuffled the kids off to day camps, vaccinated grandparents and the care of others and their return to work has already driven an acceleration of job growth? Junior’s lemonade stand might not be quite cutting it in terms of paying the bills and so exigent financial circumstances might have had parents unwilling to wait for September. What if that was why we saw monthly job gains of nearly one million in each of June and July despite the kids being off for summer? Did we all sleep walk through the re-entry of parents while markets were intoxicated by the strong jobs reports? That could mean that expectations for a rush of hiring activity as the new school year begins have not adapted to what may have already happened and could therefore face risk of disappointment.

Chart 1 suggests this is a distinct possibility. The Census Bureau’s Household Pulse Survey began in April 2020 and among the measures it tracks is how many parents say they are not working because they are at home going bonkers while taking care of the kids. The way the question is asked seems to capture parents who are not in the workforce for reasons that existed before the pandemic and that worsened during it, plus those who are in the workforce but unemployed while looking for suitable hybrid work arrangements. There is therefore likely a ‘normal’ pre-pandemic number of parents in this boat and so changes relative to a trend line are important. Results into August show the lowest tally during the pandemic to date. By corollary, if they’ve already returned to work, then there might not be the powerful effect on hiring in September.

Ironically, it could be the case that the Biden administration’s policy change to pay $300/child under age 6 and $250/child between ages 6–17 could have offered enough help for childcare that it contributed to the re-entry of parents while COVID-19 cases had collapsed until recently.

Are Kids Hit Harder by Delta?

But how likely might parents be to stay in their jobs once the new school year begins if they are concerned about exposing their children to the virus and bringing it home? That could be a very different risk to payrolls as the Delta variant rises. We don’t have a good handle on this but can offer some observations.

One may have the general impression based upon some news media coverage that kids are being affected much more adversely by the current Delta wave of COVID-19 cases than prior waves. If so, then that would be material fresh evidence that could spark a significant number of parents to  i) hold their kids back from attending in-person school or ii) to hesitate to rejoin the workforce or iii) to quit and return home again.

What’s the hard evidence? The only reason why kids are a higher share of total cases this time around appears to be because older cohorts are experiencing far fewer cases rather than proportionately more cases affecting kids. Charts 2 and 3 provide one way of looking at it. They evaluate trends in new cases across school-age K-12 cohorts as well as COVID-19 rates of morbidity. The charts do so by scaling new cases and deaths to the number of people in each cohort. It’s vital to do this because, for instance, one might otherwise be left with the false impression that kids are more vulnerable to COVID-19 now than previously just from looking at their share of total cases across the whole population when older populations are more likely to be vaccinated today. At worst the youngest cohorts are experiencing similar rates of infection to previously and the older of the young cohorts have much lower incidence rates.

What are Parents and Kids Saying?

At least in the early going part of the new school year, what also matters is whether parents and kids intend on returning to school. For this, we can only gauge survey evidence to date and cross our fingers on how it holds up. Chart 4 shows that the vast majority of parents intend on sending their kids back to school both in the under 12 cohort that is not yet eligible for vaccines and the 12+ eligible cohort.

Why? I mean apart from sanity. Chart 5 shows the number one concern motivating US parents to send their kids back is academic performance and the second reason for sending them back is that the kids want to do so; why those little darling over-achievers! Of course individual responses may vary widely and partly due to possible pre-conditions. Chart 6 shows survey responses from the neighbouring jurisdiction of Ontario, Canada where the vast majority of parents prefer in-person learning. Chart 7 also demonstrates a similar point to what can be observed in the US in that relatively younger cohorts are representing a bigger share of cases this time around because the older cohorts are much more vaccinated which doesn’t necessarily equate to younger cohorts being more vulnerable to this wave than prior waves.


For most readers what matters most is whether the Canadian election will have a major effect on financial markets. I don’t expect it to do so and will keep the focus upon why.

There is a first practical point to be made in that attempting to time market event trading strategies around the results is confronted by the fact we don’t know when we’ll get the results. Ordinarily a conventional election held in ‘normal’ times would have the results known on the evening of the election. These are clearly not normal times.

The reason we don’t know when the results will arrive is because of unprecedented use of mail-in ballots. The election will be held on September 20th, but Elections Canada guides that it expects 2–3 million requests for mail-in ballots this time due to the pandemic. There were only about 50k mail-ins last time including voters abroad even though mail-in voting has been used in Canada since 1993. We should know how many people have requested mail-in ballots by the September 14th cut-off for doing so. It may take days just to verify mail-in ballots before starting to count them. So, unless the in-person vote tallies result in a total runaway by the evening of the 20th, then the victor may have to wait until the last mail-ins are counted. Then there may be an issue of recounts and contested outcomes if the results are really close. It’s not inconceivable that Canada’s election could repeat at least some of the theatrics around the recent US election.

If we don’t know when the results will arrive then liquidity, expirations and overlap with competing market events could make trading the election fraught with greater than normal perils. For example, the FOMC statement and forecasts including a revised dot plot arrive on September 22nd and hence two days after the election. Overlapping developments could make it tough to discern any possible election effect on CAD and local rates, credit and equities—and could very well run counter to expectations around election effects.

Oh, and here’s how to get a mail-in kit and note the warning at the top of the web site about high volumes as guidance to the potential uncertainty around the number of mail-ins.

Secondly, the biggest reason why I’m skeptical there will be a notable market reaction is that this election campaign is not being fought over a key one or two policy matters of enormous importance to financial markets and the economy with stances that are materially different from the status quo. It’s not like the 1988 election that was fought over a free trade agreement with the United States, or the two elections in the 1990s that were fought over repairing the country’s finances. I can’t honestly say that one platform will be more fiscally conservative than another, more pro-growth than another, more (or less) inflationary than another or even friendlier to key sectors than another. If so, then there may be no material impact upon monetary policy either. A risk to that view would clearly be a majority government emboldened to drive more expansionary fiscal policy but the parties appear to offer similar risks in that sense.

Then we’re left with the usual points about elections. We all know that polls are hugely uncertain and have gotten more wrong than right over time and across the world. Trump’s 2016 victory and the Brexit vote earlier that year remain two of the biggest examples over recent years. A recent domestic example was the surprise majority victory by the Conservatives in the Nova Scotia election. Polls are more about providing infotainment than anything else. We’ll reserve judgement until we see what actually happens on game day.

Further, models to translate popular votes into seats in a first-past-the-post electoral system are highly imprecise even if the popular vote shares proved accurate.

That said, polls and models suggest there is still a fairly high chance at a status quo outcome with the Liberals getting another minority backed by the NDP. In order to surprise markets, the Conservatives or Liberals or NDP would have to win 170 or more seats and form a majority which at present is not supported by the (often unreliable) polls. This could well change in multiple ways.

Then there is the issue of platform intentions versus what actually gets implemented following the election. That’s open to judgement as things unfold.

In conclusion, I've heard more predictions of market effects stemming from election outcomes that proved to be dead wrong than right. The above arguments add to the reasons to be careful as market participants in trying to estimate the impact of this election.


A steady stream of global macro readings also lies ahead with every major region participating.

Yet another wave of global purchasing managers’ indices arrive and will offer further Q3 growth signals (charts 8–13). US ISM measures for manufacturing (Tuesday) and services (Friday) could cool due to a combination of supply-side challenges and the rise of the Delta variant but watch the price and hiring signals particularly closely. China updates the state’s purchasing managers’ indices for August on Monday and then the private PMIs on Tuesday and Thursday. Mexico will refresh its manufacturing PMI Wednesday and Brazil will update its suite of PMIs on Wednesday and Friday. India updates PMIs on Wednesday and Friday.

US markets will also consider several other macro readings before nonfarm payrolls arrive. The Conference Board’s consumer confidence reading for August might follow the UoM sentiment measure lower on Tuesday, but the CB measure has been the stronger one so far this year and is more weighted toward jobs. Vehicle sales are expected to plummet in Wednesday’s tally for August given advance industry guidance. Construction spending might drop given a significant decline in housing starts that would be difficult for nonresidential construction spending to overcome. The trade deficit likely narrowed as a services surplus gets added to what we already know happened to the goods deficit (Thursday). Factory orders might inch forward on nondurable goods orders given we already know that durable goods orders were soft (Thursday).

Canada will update GDP for the month of June with preliminary July guidance and will also report on overall Q2 GDP growth on Tuesday. I’ve gone with 0.7% m/m which is consistent with StatsCan’s ‘flash’ guidance provided at the end of July, as well as 2 ½% annualized growth for Q2 which would be roughly in line with BoC expectations. The bigger issue is where July GDP lands since we have only a handful of readings to go by. It might be a pretty strong start to Q3 given reopening effects and limited data such as hours worked that were up by 1.3% m/m, although housing starts slipped a bit and existing home resales fell by 3.5% m/m which drives lower ancillary service activity.

European markets will principally focus upon a round of inflation updates with nothing material due in the UK. Eurozone CPI for August (Tuesday) is expected to push a little higher in month-ago terms but the year-ago base effect shift could drive a powerful gain in core CPI from 0.7% y/y to about double that which the ECB would likely look through as a transitory boost through to year-end.

Australia updates Q2 GDP growth on Tuesday and growth is expected to cool materially toward ½% q/q after a trio of bullish readings from 2020Q3 through Q1 this year. The renewed rise of the COVID-19 virus sparked lockdowns in its major cities and downside risk as the economy transitioned into Q3. 

Brazil’s economy is also expected to grind to a near halt for similar reasons when Q2 GDP growth arrives on Tuesday.

India’s economy will likely see Q2 GDP growth surge in year-over-year terms driven by base effects on Tuesday.

Asia-Pacific markets will consider CPI updates from South Korea and Indonesia, as well as the monthly data dump out of Japan starting with retail sales, industrial production and the jobless rate followed by housing starts, Q2 capex spending and vehicle sales.

Only one global central bank is on tap this week. Chile’s central bank is expected to hike again on Tuesday. Our Chilean economists expect a 25bps increase in the overnight rate as headline inflation for July registered at 4.5% y/y, breaching the upper band of the bank's 3 +/- 1% target inflation range. A hike would follow the decision in July to raise the policy rate by 25bps to 0.75% and some within consensus anticipate a half point rate hike. Across LatAm markets the only release of note will be Peru’s CPI report on Wednesday that is likely to continue to see headline inflation sharply outpace core. 


This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.

These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.

Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.

Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.

This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.

™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.

Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.

Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.

Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.