• Fed flags progress toward goals…
  • ...but repeats it’s not quite there yet to merit tapering…
  • ...that continues to be expected later this year
  • The overall tone was cautiously optimistic…
  • ...with hints of less conviction on transitory inflation in timing and magnitude

This meeting’s communications were broadly what one would have expected the FOMC to do given the uncertainties, given it wasn’t a forecast meeting per se, given the gap before the next meeting on September 22nd with Jackson Hole in between and not to mention a likely bun fight over the debt ceiling over coming weeks. The FOMC struck the right balance between indicating further progress toward tapering and that a deeper taper dialogue occurred at this meeting, but they reinforced nearer-term focus upon the course of data and events over ‘coming meetings.’

So far, that’s consistent with our assumption that taper guidance piles up into the Fall before announcing toward late year. Attention now shifts toward subsequent revelations on the tone of the taper dialogue as various FOMC officials take to the podium on the path to the meeting minutes three weeks from today.


There were few statement changes, but they leaned in the direction of cautious optimism and progress toward tapering. See the statement comparison at the back of this note.

  • The description of current conditions in the second paragraph was little changed.
  • The main change was in the fourth paragraph. They now reference communication on buying US$120B per month until ‘substantial further progress’ toward dual mandate goals has been achieved in the past tense (last December) and update their tracking by noting that “since then, the economy has made progress toward these goals.”

Treasury yields spiked a touch higher on that “progress” headline and the dollar rallied, until Chair Powell walked it back a bit in the press conference by noting that “‘we have not reached substantial further progress and have some ground to cover to get there.” That’s somewhat of a truism to anyone closely following developments, but I guess it meant something to markets.


On the Delta variant, Powell sounded cautiously optimistic. He noted “What we've seen through successive waves is that the economic implications have tended to be lessening. We'll see if that's the case but it's not an unreasonable expectation. It's plausible that people may pull back from some activities. It might weigh on the return to the labour market. We don't have a strong sense of how that will work but we will be monitoring it closely.”


If I heard correctly, then the Fed Chair is sounding less and less strident in terms of his conviction that inflation will magically disappear almost at each successive meeting and after every inflation report. When asked whether they have met their goals on the price stability side of the dual mandate, Powell deferred to the consensus by saying “that is up to the committee.” Whaa? In the past he tended to dive on that grenade himself. This tone shift likely reflects the greater number of FOMC officials speaking out about inflation risk now versus earlier in the year. Powell did repeat that “we think it will move back down to our objective” but that contrasts to his earlier remarks about inflation all being base effect driven which implied a belief that inflation would crash back down. We’re not hearing quite that same message now.

In fact, when pressed further on inflation and whether it has met the policy goal threshold of moderately exceeding 2% for some time, Powell again deferred to the Committee. He went on to dismiss the question by stating “It really isn't relevant now because we're looking at tapering purchases and are a ways away from lift-off which we are not at all near. That's when we will ask that question.” Ok then, a bit defensive there. That’s a significant narrative shift compared to earlier stridency.

When pressed yet again on inflation, Powell did revert to earlier views that most of the inflation overshoot can be tied to a handful of categories that may be temporarily fed by reopening effects and “We think inflation should move down over time.” For a brief moment it sounded like the Powell of several meetings ago, but he then went on to state “We don't have much confidence in the size or timing of that.” The latter part is also less aggressive than certainly his earlier dismissals of inflation risk but also more recent ones. Powell then went on to note “ I would say in the near term the [ed. inflation] risks are to the upside. I would say the medium-term risks will see it return toward our objective.” Ok then, so you’ve met your objective? Seems so, just without bluntly stating as much.

Where I thought it got a bit confusing was in Powell’s remark that full employment was usually necessary to get inflation persistence, yet inflation may be transitory despite his remark that “it shouldn’t take long to get there” meaning toward full employment. If so and his assumption in favour of “strong job creation” over the duration of the year comes to fruition, then given the inflation connection through uncertain Phillips curve connections then why wouldn’t inflation be persistent?

It may also be worth repeating my personal view that Chair Powell might be putting too much weight upon transitory upsides and not enough on potentially transitory downsides to present inflation readings in a more balanced fashion (recall here). Powell still seems to be taking a one-sided view of transitory and indicated it wouldn’t take long to test this. That too is debatable since transitory shouldn’t be defined as a one or two quarter test versus a full cycle perspective in terms of how policy should view the issue.


When probed on whether bond markets are saying the Fed is about to over-tighten, Powell said “I don’t think there is a real consensus on what explains the move between meetings. I don’t see in any of that that there is really anything that challenges the credibility of our framework.”

Powell dismissed the prospect of raising the policy rate while still buying assets which largely dismisses the minority view in favour of early rate hikes given the amount of time it is likely to take to wind down net purchases to zero.

Powell also again downplayed the prospect of tapering MBS purchases faster or more aggressively than Treasury purchases by saying there is “little support” on the FOMC for doing so. 



This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.

These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.

Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.

Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.

This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.

™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.

Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.

Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.

Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.