ON DECK FOR FRIDAY, JULY 9
- Markets are ending the week with steeper curves
- Easing restrictions expected to boost Canadian jobs
- Canada’s tighter job market and weaker productivity may be driving greater wage-price effects than in the US
- China follow through on pledge to cut required reserves…
- …curiously after strong financing figures…
- …and stable but low core inflation
- The UK’s rebound disappointed
- Fed’s MPR to be a sideshow before Powell’s testimony
We may be ending the week with a bit of a reversal of recent moves in bonds. The US 10 year yield is up 4–5bps to 1.34% with Canada’s curve performing similar ahead of jobs data while gilts are steepening only slightly less but EGBs are outperforming. The dollar has been slightly depreciating since China’s RRR announcement a little earlier. Stocks are gaining with European cash markets up by about ¾% to 1¾% and N.A. futures up by ¼% – ½% or so except for the flat Nasdaq.
Somewhat curiously after China’s financing figures beat expectations and following a flat core inflation reading, the PBOC cut the required reserve ratios for most banks (excluding those that have implemented a deposit reserve ratio of 5%) by 50bps (chart 1). The move will be effective next Thursday. The statement flagged motivations including rising costs at some firms and supporting the economy.
China’s headline inflation ebbed a touch more than expected in June (+1.1% y/y from 1.3%, consensus 1.2%) but core inflation remained unchanged at 0.9%. Aggregate “social” financing was up 3.67 trillion yuan in June (2.89T consensus) for the strongest gain since the usual burst in January of each year. Yuan denominated loans were up 2.12T yuan (consensus 1.85T). Chart 2 shows that aggregate financing flows so far this year are the second strongest on record, but because they were so strong last year, the growth rate in outstandings has been sharply ebbing this year (chart 3). Chart 4 shows that local currency loan flows are at a record high and so growth in outstandings is relatively stable (chart 5).
The UK economy rebounded by less than consensus expected across several readings but neither gilts nor sterling really cared. GDP grew by 0.8% m/m in May (consensus 1.5%) with a downward revision to 2% (from 2.3%). Industrial output was up 0.8% m/m (consensus 1.4%) but with a minor upward revision (-1% instead of -1.3%). The services index expanded by 0.9% (consensus 1.6%) and also carried downward revisions (2.8% instead of 3.4%). Finally, construction output unexpectedly shrank (-0.8% m/m, consensus +1%) with part of that explained by an upward revision (-0.7% m/m instead of -2%).
The Fed releases its semi-annual monetary policy report today (11amET), but risk is usually focused upon Chair Powell’s subsequent testimony (next Thursday).
Canada updates job market figures for June this morning (8:30amET). It coincidentally turns out that the guesstimate I submitted a week ago Monday matches the later median consensus figure at 175k but the band of estimates is rather wide. The range cuts from +40k to +285k with a high standard deviation of 77k. LFS has a 95% CI of +/-58k around the survey sample estimate and so a band of nearly 120k conveys the massive and humbling role played by statistical noise in analogous fashion to the US household survey. The point, however, is that there should be a meaningful gain today.
The main driver will be reopening effects as provincial stringency indices fell sharply between the May and June survey reference weeks (here). Most of that easing over that period occurred outside of Ontario that is joining a little later on and so I would expect the composition of gains to reflect that fact. During the June reference week, Quebec’s restrictions fell back to the lowest since last September before the start of the second wave.
Also note that the Ivey PMI registered a further improvement in the employment subindex to the highest not only of the pandemic but in the 21 year history of the survey since 2000 (chart 6). Most of this LFS report will likely be about callback effects as outright job seeking probably picked up later if data on google searches are any indication. Hiring plans across small businesses also continue to pick up.
In a bigger picture sense, Canada has less labour slack than the US and because rising labour costs are outstripping productivity growth the result is that labour market developments are more inflationary in Canada than in the US to date during the pandemic. The BoC is remiss not to be publicly speaking about this issue. Across the pond, we heard BoE Governor Bailey speaking about weak UK productivity this morning and yet in Canada the BoC is silent on the topic.
As evidence, consider the following:
- The participation rate is 3 percentage points higher in Canada than in the US but some of that is a measurement distortion of likely ~1ppt.
- Half the difference in the official unemployment rates is a measurement issue and StatsCan’s conversion of the UR to US measurement concepts cuts down the real difference to Canada just being ~1.2 ppt over the US (likely less today?). See chart 7.
- Canada has a NAIRU (basically full employment equilibrium UR) that is estimated by the OECD to be 2.2 ppts higher than the US. Basically Canada has a less flexible workforce with more structural unemployment than the US.
- Net out the adjusted UR and the NAIRU differences and Canada is closer to full employment than the US (chart 8).
- The US is blowing Canada away on labour productivity growth last year and this. It was the same coming out of the GFC (hence one reason Carney hiked ahead of the Fed in 2010...). Chart 9.
- Yet wage growth is sticky with the BoC's nominal wage common measure ~3.4% y/y in Q1 and most other measures higher. That's not base effect driven as the artificial surge in wage growth was in Q2 last year and it was temporary. Chart 10.
- As a consequence of the last two points, unit labour costs in common currency terms have risen faster in Canada than in the US. ie: productivity-adjusted labour costs are more inflationary in Canada. Chart 11.
Markets should be paying attention to these dynamics as the feedback effect on inflation is among the factors expected to force the BoC’s hand toward hiking ahead of the Fed unless even more on the FOMC continue to pull forward their own hike guidance into next year from 2023. A fully inclusive job market recovery would be a wonderful thing but we must also talk about productivity when linking job market developments to the BoC’s inflation mandate.
This report has been prepared by Scotiabank Economics as a resource for the clients of Scotiabank. Opinions, estimates and projections contained herein are our own as of the date hereof and are subject to change without notice. The information and opinions contained herein have been compiled or arrived at from sources believed reliable but no representation or warranty, express or implied, is made as to their accuracy or completeness. Neither Scotiabank nor any of its officers, directors, partners, employees or affiliates accepts any liability whatsoever for any direct or consequential loss arising from any use of this report or its contents.
These reports are provided to you for informational purposes only. This report is not, and is not constructed as, an offer to sell or solicitation of any offer to buy any financial instrument, nor shall this report be construed as an opinion as to whether you should enter into any swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. The information contained in this report is not intended to be, and does not constitute, a recommendation of a swap or trading strategy involving a swap within the meaning of U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission Regulation 23.434 and Appendix A thereto. This material is not intended to be individually tailored to your needs or characteristics and should not be viewed as a “call to action” or suggestion that you enter into a swap or trading strategy involving a swap or any other transaction. Scotiabank may engage in transactions in a manner inconsistent with the views discussed this report and may have positions, or be in the process of acquiring or disposing of positions, referred to in this report.
Scotiabank, its affiliates and any of their respective officers, directors and employees may from time to time take positions in currencies, act as managers, co-managers or underwriters of a public offering or act as principals or agents, deal in, own or act as market makers or advisors, brokers or commercial and/or investment bankers in relation to securities or related derivatives. As a result of these actions, Scotiabank may receive remuneration. All Scotiabank products and services are subject to the terms of applicable agreements and local regulations. Officers, directors and employees of Scotiabank and its affiliates may serve as directors of corporations.
Any securities discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. Scotiabank recommends that investors independently evaluate any issuer and security discussed in this report, and consult with any advisors they deem necessary prior to making any investment.
This report and all information, opinions and conclusions contained in it are protected by copyright. This information may not be reproduced without the prior express written consent of Scotiabank.
™ Trademark of The Bank of Nova Scotia. Used under license, where applicable.
Scotiabank, together with “Global Banking and Markets”, is a marketing name for the global corporate and investment banking and capital markets businesses of The Bank of Nova Scotia and certain of its affiliates in the countries where they operate, including; Scotiabank Europe plc; Scotiabank (Ireland) Designated Activity Company; Scotiabank Inverlat S.A., Institución de Banca Múltiple, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V., Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, Scotia Inverlat Derivados S.A. de C.V. – all members of the Scotiabank group and authorized users of the Scotiabank mark. The Bank of Nova Scotia is incorporated in Canada with limited liability and is authorised and regulated by the Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions Canada. The Bank of Nova Scotia is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and is subject to regulation by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and limited regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority. Details about the extent of The Bank of Nova Scotia's regulation by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority are available from us on request. Scotiabank Europe plc is authorized by the UK Prudential Regulation Authority and regulated by the UK Financial Conduct Authority and the UK Prudential Regulation Authority.
Scotiabank Inverlat, S.A., Scotia Inverlat Casa de Bolsa, S.A. de C.V, Grupo Financiero Scotiabank Inverlat, and Scotia Inverlat Derivados, S.A. de C.V., are each authorized and regulated by the Mexican financial authorities.
Not all products and services are offered in all jurisdictions. Services described are available in jurisdictions where permitted by law.